The good, the bad, and the wonderful
Nov. 23rd, 2006 05:42 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I received some extremely venomous feedback recently. I posted this drabble at 'Twisting the Hellmouth' and someone reviewed it thus:
I have to say this is story was complete dribble, and resembles the work of a 5 year old with too much time on their hands. In the words of Jay Pinkerton, reading this is quite literally "like going to the bathroom after a six-burrito lunch, and the toilet paper is YOUR EYES."
Surely that level of vitriolic condemnation is entirely inappropriate for a drabble? Even were it the worst drabble ever written (and I had quite a few favourable comments and so it can't have been that bad, can it?) how bad can 100 words be?
The TtH account is newly created and this is the only review it has posted. Strange. I wondered if it might be a sock puppet specifically for the purposes of a personal attack on me, but the TtH mods say that no other users from that IP address have ever posted there. And I'm not aware of having any Internet enemies.
Anyway, I'm not going to let it upset me. I'll press on with 'Dojo Hard', which is within sight of the end after my burst of 3 chapters in 4 days, and hopefully I'll get it finished this week.
And on to a more pleasant Sock Puppet. The incredible
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 05:52 pm (UTC)Constructive critsicsm is a word that doesn't belong in most people's vocalbulary.
To be honest i'm quite disgusted.
I think your writing is fabulous, bollocks to the cynics out there.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 06:04 pm (UTC)I think the drabble is FABULOUS. *hugs*
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 06:04 pm (UTC)I know intimately how hurtful it is to be attacked in that manner
I admire your stand in that matter
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 06:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 06:40 pm (UTC)Either way weird! Sorry to hear about it!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-11-24 11:05 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 06:42 pm (UTC)I will say something though. Your writing can be very difficult to judge (I had to judge Savage Beauty for the RDAs), because most of the time it's all about the joke and if you don't get it, you're stuffed - fortunately, most of the time, I do!
I know you can write beutifully, Cloak of Mist is a fabulous example of that, but sometimes serving the jokes can make the prose seem weaker than it really is, because that's often the point. It makes your work tricky to compare.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 06:56 pm (UTC)Don't sweat it, your stuff rocks.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 07:33 pm (UTC)Wow. THAT's sophisticated and adult.
Oh, wait, no it isn't. It's stupid and immature and wildly inaccurate at that. Ignore it. Please.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 07:51 pm (UTC)I had to look up Jay Pinkerton as I had no idea who he was. My guess is that the reviewer was trying to be funny. Just as I might say "God, Speaker, that was truly HORRIBLE!" and you'd laugh because you know what I mean (and I do--mean it), I think that's what the reviewer was trying to do. The review seems to me to be much too complex and layered to be an actual insult.
I think that explanation is as likely as that someone for incomprehensible reasons attacked a DRABBLE viciously (talk about using a blunderbuss to kill a gnat). And if you take my explanation, then the review is just funny, though inept. And a compliment, of sorts.
f
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 08:33 pm (UTC)(The drabble was excellent, BTW. Excellent in an "Oh dear lord" way.)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 08:37 pm (UTC)a. Has no sense of humor (or doesn't get yours)
b. Doesn't know Agatha Christie and/or Xena
c. Can't appreciate the thought of Xander being the spawn of such!
Personally it just shows a lacking on their part IMHO. I loved the drabble and am finding it far too easy to picture that as Xander's parentage (so much explained!). I often wonder what odd planet some people hale from and why they feel the need to be as offensive as humanly possible. A simple, "I don't get it, didn't like it." would have sufficed. The whole bathroom visual was crude and unnecessary (and I think the real reason for the reply at all.....someone had the mistaken idea that their "put down" was a work of wit and looked for a place to use it. This says much about their humor level in comparison to the droll drabble they chose as a target.)
In short.....the reviewer was clearly an idiot and you are still the king of intelligent and funny!
Kathleen
thanks for the well wishes for our holiday...hope your weekend leads to lots of things to be thankful for.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 08:44 pm (UTC)I'm inclined to go with a troll and you were unfortunate enough to be their target. I certainly wouldn't take it personally or as a reflection on the drabble. Which, BTW, made me both groan and smile, which I am pretty sure was your aim. LOL
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 09:05 pm (UTC)what a wanker!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 09:56 pm (UTC)Someone up there said something to the effect that Mr. Hostile Anonymous had found that disgusting quote and was looking for the first opportunity to use it, and I'll go along with that. It was entirely inappropriate for the subject, even given a bad reaction; one should, really, keep ones insults proportionate to the matter.
Must vote "yea" for your recommendation of "Sockpuppet;" my recommendation is in the Slash thread at the S'cubie board as should be my usual practice.
Julia, at least, with my terrible deficiency in answering comments of late, I'm at least not guilty of such a totally outsized and dumb-headed overreaction
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 09:57 pm (UTC)I was really pleased to read the drabble. It made me laugh. I'm a longtime Christie fan, read and reread all of the Poirot stories, and a big "Xena" fan too.
It was a very funny and witty (and groan-worthy punny, of course!) drabble, I thought. And I'm glad I didn't miss it!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 09:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 10:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-24 02:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-24 02:09 am (UTC)And your drabble made me snicker! Besides the joke, you got a lot of refs into 100 words.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-24 02:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-24 05:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-24 05:51 am (UTC)There is NOTHING everyone can agree is unfunny. Well, except for Carrot Top, that is...
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-24 06:53 am (UTC)it.
Your reviewer was unnecessarily cruel. Ignore him/her; move on.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-24 09:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: