TrustFlow results for speakr2customrs

[speaker_to_customers]

I tried out TrustFlow II for LiveJournal. The following people not on the friends list for speakr2customrs are close by:

• eurydice72, anaross (350 - 400)
• herself_nyc, fer1213, wisteria_ (400 - 450)
• st_salieri, virtual_ford, mrmonkeybottoms (450 - 500)

• sadbhyl, nwhepcat (500 - 550)
• marsterslady, sandy_s, doyle_sb4, evenstar_estel, estepheia, ladyanne04 (550 - 600)
• moxie_fic, lillianmorgan, shipperx, spikeskat, awmp (600 - 650)
• pepperlandgirl4, cindermom, poshcat, lordshiva, kellyhk, eliade, beanbeans, sweet_ali, deborahmm, just_sue (650 - 700)
• slaymesoftly, sexymermaid, whenbuffysmiles, ladyoneill, frelling_tralk, uisge_beatha, superplin, crackers4jenn, tabaqui, annapurna_2, fishsanwitt, spikeylover (700 - 750)
• mary5958, dovil, eyesthatslay, bittenandstaked, buffyx, stultiloquentia, sockmonkeyhere, bunnykittycoat, jamalov29 (750 - 800)
• nemo_gravis, allaboutspike, the_royal_anna, ginmar, gwyn_r, peasant_, rwp, rikki_oko, stoney321, witling, thisficklemob (800 - 850)
• just_kumi, tesla321, rusty_halo, canadia_bit, ladycat777, karabair, icemink, karbear57, kats_meow, lovesbitca, mustangsally78, crazydiamondsue, molly_may, jimbutcher (850 - 900)
• spikesbint, _a_s_h_l_e_e_, jwaneeta, __tiana__, soundingsea, angelic_amy, megan_tam_fics, redeem147, itsabigrock, jypzrose, wesleysgirl, _jems_, kargrif, echidnas_pen, onetwomany, zarrah04 (900 - 950)
• irishrose1, xanphibian, honorh, kcarolj65, thebratqueen, chrisjournal, aj_hofacre (950 - 1000)

Created by ciphergoth; hosted by LShift.

TrustFlow II: Who is closest to your friends list?

There are names on there that are very familiar to me; some I've considered Friending and probably would have done if I didn't have such a big F-list already. At least 2 I follow on a semi-regular basis without having them Friended as such. And, interestingly, two of the three second closest were Friends but Unfriended me without explanation, as a few lower on the list have also done.

Comments

[gillo]

Rather bizarre results when I tried it - the first two names were people I'd never heard of who seemed to have neither interests not friends in common with me. Thereafter it was more reasonable - a lot of names I see frequently and, like you, have considered friending.

[spikewriter]

Mine was interesting -- the top of the list was someone I didn't know at all. I had a number of people who I keep thinking for friending but don't because of the problems I have keeping up with my list as it is, some people who'd defriended me at one point or another and some I'd defriended.

There were also several people who are on my "no way in hell am I friending them" list because their opinions irritate me for one reason or another and someone I'd actually banned from my journal because I didn't want them anywhere near it. This is the reason I never publically post the results of this thing.

[jerusha]

Interesting. It's kind of odd to see what a small world it is.

[evilawyer.livejournal.com]

I don't understand what those numbers behind the user names mean. I grow less and less statistically-oriented with every passing year.

[hesadevil.livejournal.com]

Do you understand how that thing works? Is it based on interests, Flists or what?

lillianmorgans's a good egg. She's recently returned to NZ having spent the past few years in London.